Hygiena 2020, 65(1):17-21 | DOI: 10.21101/hygiena.a1731

Minimisation of risk of exposure to mercury

Katarína Kromerová1,2, Vladimír Bencko2
1 Úrad verejného zdravotníctva Slovenskej republiky, Bratislava, Slovenská republika
2 Univerzita Karlova, 1. lékařská fakulta, Ústav hygieny a epidemiologie a Všeobecná fakultní nemocnice, Praha, Česká republika

Mercury is found in the environment due to human activities or natural processes. Due to long-range atmospheric transport capacity, biotransformation into organic forms, bioaccumulation and biomagnification in the food chain in combination with high toxicity, mercury has become a priority environmental contaminant, which the World Health Organization has identified as one of the ten most dangerous chemicals for public health. Mercury exposures in developed countries show significant economic costs, especially in the form of economic productivity losses. Studies have also highlighted the significant economic benefits of preventing mercury pollution in the US and worldwide. The Community Strategy concerning Mercury has contributed to the development and strengthening of a comprehensive body of European Union legislation dealing with various aspects of the mercury problem. Growing concern has led to many forms of international efforts to address these issues. In October 2013, an international treaty was signed (the Minimata Convention on Mercury) to control the global release of mercury into the environment.

Keywords: mercury, contamination of foodstuffs, health risk management, food

Received: August 2019; Accepted: November 19, 2019; Published: February 29, 2020  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Kromerová K, Bencko V. Minimisation of risk of exposure to mercury. Hygiena. 2020;65(1):17-21. doi: 10.21101/hygiena.a1731.
Download citation

References

  1. Kromerová K, Bencko V. Súčasné trendy v procese hodnotenia rizika expozície cudzorodým látka vrátane expozície z potravín. Hygiena. 2017;62(2):54-61. Go to original source...
  2. Schober SE, Sinks TH, Jones RL, Bolger PM, McDowell M, Osterloh J, et al. Blood mercury levels in US children and women of childbearing age, 1999-2000. JAMA. 2003 Apr 2;289(13):1667-74. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Bjørklund G, Dadar M, Mutter J, Aaseth J. The toxicology of mercury: current research and emerging trends. Environ Res. 2017 Nov;159:545-54. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Maqbool F, Niaz K, Hassan FI, Khan F, Abdollahi M. Immunotoxicity of mercury: pathological and toxicological effects. J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev. 2017 Jan 2;35(1):29-46. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Kim KH, Kabir E, Jahan SA. A review on the distribution of Hg in the environment and its human health impacts. J Hazard Mater. 2016 Apr 5;306:376-85. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Khan F, Momtaz S, Abdollahi M. The relationship between mercury exposure and epigenetic alterations regarding human health, risk assessment and diagnostic strategies. J Trace Elem Med Biol. 2019 Mar;52:37-47. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Tuček M, Bencko V, Krýsl S. Zdravotní rizika rtuti ze zubních amalgámu. Chem Listy. 2007;101(12):1038-44.
  8. World Health Organization [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2005 [cited 2019 Nov 19]. Mercury in Health Care. Policy Paper. WHO/SDE/WSH/05.08. Available from: https://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/medicalwaste/mercurypolpap230506.pdf.
  9. Castaño A, Pedraza-Díaz S, Cañas AI, Pérez-Gómez B, Ramos JJ, Bartolomé M, et al. Mercury levels in blood, urine and hair in a nation-wide sample of Spanish adults. Sci Total Environ. 2019 Jun 20;670:262-70. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Ha E, Basu N, Bose-O'Reilly S, Dórea JG, McSorley E, Sakamoto M, et al. Current progress on understanding the impact of mercury on human health. Environ Res. 2017 Jan;152:419-33. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Kimáková T, Kuzmová L, Nevolná Z, Bencko V. Fish and fish products as risk factors of mercury exposure. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2018 Sep 25;25(3):488-93. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Trasande L, DiGangi J, Evers DC, Petrlik J, Buck DG, Šamánek J, et al. Economic implications of mercury exposure in the context of the global mercury treaty: hair mercury levels and estimated lost economic productivity in selected developing countries. J Environ Manage. 2016 Dec 1;183:229-35. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Bellanger M, Pichery C, Aerts D, Berglund M, Castaño A, Čejchanová M, et al.; DEMO/COPHES. Economic benefits of methylmercury exposure control in Europe: Monetary value ofneurotoxicity prevention. Environ Health. 2013 Jan 7;12:3. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. European Commission [Internet]. Brussels: EC; 18 May 2017 [cited 2019 Nov 19]. Press release. Questions and answers: EU mercury policy and the ratification of the Minamata Convention. Available from: http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-17-1344_en.htm.
  15. Science for Environment Policy. Tackling mercury pollution in the EU and worldwide. In-depth Report 15 produced for the European Commission [Internet]. Bristol: Science Communication Unit UWE; 2017 [cited 2019 Nov 19]. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/science-environment-policy.
  16. Selin H, Keane SE, Wang S, Selin NE, Davis K, Bally D. Linking science and policy to support the implementation of the Minamata Convention on Mercury. 2018. Ambio. 2018 Mar;47(2):198-215. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. EFSA Scientific Committee. Statement on the benefits of fish/seafood consumption compared to the risks of methylmercury in fish/seafood. EFSA J. 2015 Jan;13(1):3982. Go to original source...
  18. European Commission [Internet]. Brussels: EC; 18 May 2017 [cited 2019 Nov 19]. Press release. EU protects citizens from toxic mercury, paves the way for global action. from. Available from: http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-17-1345_en.htm.
  19. Choi J, Aarøe Mørck T, Polcher A, Knudsen LE, Joas A. Review of the state of the art of human biomonitoring for chemical substances and its application to human exposure assessment for food safety. External scientific report. EFSA Support Pub. 2015 Feb;12(2):724E. Go to original source...
  20. Angerer J, Ewers U, Wilhelm M. Human biomonitoring: state of the art. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2007 May;210(3-4):201-28. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...