Hygiena 2019, 64(3):105-111 | DOI: 10.21101/hygiena.a1720
Microbiological monitoring of laboratory mice environment in a barrier experimental facility
- Státní zdravotní ústav, Praha, Česká republika
Aim: The health status of laboratory animals affects their suitability for research, therefore it is important that each facility with laboratory animals has its own program of animal quality control. The source of the infection, however, may not only be the laboratory animals, but also on infiltration agent from the outside environment. In the framework of the animal biosecurity concept, microbiological monitoring of the environment is carried out in many foreign animal facilities. The aim of our work was to evaluate how the above-mentioned microbiological monitoring of animal environment may contribute to the Animal Health Quality Control Program.
Methods: Over a period of 3 years, through swabs from the surfaces of the monitored sites, we evaluated the hygienic condition of the laboratory mice (inbred strain BALB/c) after sanitation. We have focussed not only on breeding containers and their accessories, but also on predilection sites where they come into contact with supplied material and entering personnel. Furthermore, we have monitored the composition of the microflora in breeding vessels after their week-long settlement with the inbred strain of BALB/c mice. The obtained results were confronted with results obtained from the swabs of visible mucous membranes from both live and sacrificed mice of the same strain and the results obtained by microbiological examination of organs after autopsy. Independent microbiological examination of mice was provided by an external facility.
Results: Our results show that microbiological examination of swabs after sanitation of breeding cages, their lids and selected predilection sites in the animal room has demonstrated satisfactory efficacy of our sanitation procedures. Microbiological examination of swabs from used breeding vessels has shown consistency with the results achieved in both live and sacrificed mice and the absence of bacterial pathogens that can cause serious human and animal diseases.
Conclusion: The results have confirmed our intention to include the use of swabs from laboratory mice and swabs from their visible mucous membranes in our animal health control program with the potential to reduce the number of sacrificed mice without compromising integrity during experiments.
Keywords: laboratory animals, health status, microbiological monitoring, environmental sanitation
Received: June 2019; Accepted: July 28, 2019; Published: August 20, 2019 Show citation
ACS | AIP | APA | ASA | Harvard | Chicago | Chicago Notes | IEEE | ISO690 | MLA | NLM | Turabian | Vancouver |
References
- Pritchett-Corning KR, Shek WR, Henderson KS, Clifford CB. Companion guide to rodent health surveillance for research facilities. Wilmington: Charles River; 2009.
- Mähler Convenor M, Berard M, Feinstein R, Gallagher A, Illgen-Wilcke B, Pritchett-Corning K, et al. FELASA recommendations for the health monitoring of mouse, rat, hamster, guinea pig and rabbit colonies in breeding and experimental units. Lab Anim. 2014;48(3):178-92.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Committee for the Update of the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals; Institute for Laboratory Animal Research. Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals. 6th ed. Washington, D. C.: Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources; 1996.
- Zákon č. 246/1992 Sb., na ochranu zvířat proti týrání ve znění pozdějších předpisů. Sbírka zákonů ČR. 1992;částka 50:1284-90.
- Zákon č. 166/1999 Sb., o veterinární péči a o změně některých souvisejících zákonů (veterinární zákon) ve znění pozdějších předpisů. Sbírka zákonů ČR. 1999;částka 57:3122-50.
- Ednie LD, Wilson RP, Lang CM. Comparison of two sanitation monitoring methods in an animal research facility. Lab Anim Sci. 1998;37(6):71-4.
- Shields RP, Schramm B, Braune NE. Evaluation of room cleaning procedures in a laboratory animal facility. Lab Anim. 1979;13(3):253-6.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Schondelmeyer CW, Dillehay, DL, Webb SK, Huerkamp MJ, Mook DM, Pullium JK. Investigation of appropriate sanitization frequency for rodent caging accessories: evidence supporting less-frequent cleaning. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2006 Nov;45(6):40-3.
- Wellstood-Nuesse S, Shields RP. Environmental monitoring in a laboratory animal facility. Lab Anim Sci, 1976 Aug;26(4):592-9.
- Guanzini L. Microbiological monitoring program in conventional animal facilities. Standard operating procedure (SOP). Cornell University, Cornell Center for Animal Resources and Education; 2006.
- Dubos R, Schaedler RW, Costello R, Hoet P. Indigenous, normal, and autochthonous flora of the gastrointestinal tract. J Exp Med. 1965;122(1):67-76.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Kloos WE, Schleifer KH, Smith RF. Characterization of Staphylococcus sciuri sp.nov. and its subspeies. Inter J Syst Bacteriol. 1976;26(1):22-37.
Go to original source...
- Schaedler RW, Dubos RJ. The fecal flora of various strains of mice. Its bearing on their susceptibility to endotoxin. J Exp Med. 1962 Jun 1;115:1149-60.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Schaedler RW, Dubos R, Costello R. The development of the bacterial flora in the gastrointestinal tract of mice. J Exp Med. 1965 Jul 1;122:59-66.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Vařejka F, Mráz O, Smola J. Speciální veterinární mikrobiologie. Praha: SZN; 1989.
- Směrnice Evropského parlamentu a Rady 2010/63/EU, o ochraně zvířat používaných pro vědecké účely. Úřední věstník EU. 2010;53(L 276):33-79.