Hygiena 2014, 59(1):47-49 | DOI: 10.21101/hygiena.a1219
Monitoring and Evaluation of Health Promotion Programmes
- Masarykova univerzita, Lékařská fakulta, Ústav preventivního lékařství, Brno
For correct processing, health promotion programmes require not only the key element of intervention as a project instrument, but also proper assessment, which means programme monitoring and evaluation. Monitoring and evaluation should follow a sophisticated procedure with specific standards and conditions that need to be respected. Prior to evaluation of the project, it is important to determine specific evaluation criteria; amongst basic conditions of properly selected criteria are correctly selected indicators of such an evaluation. Improperly set indicators, that do not reflect the objectives of the project and are not relevant to them represent the most commonly enacted mistake in the majority of health promotion programmes. It is advisable to plan both internal and external evaluation and to list anticipated obstacles and barriers in advance, in order to define the concept of "project effectiveness" for each specific programme, and attempt to predict a project "cost/effect" ratio. Proposals of health promotion programmes, as part of planned monitoring and evaluation, should include clearly defined methods for presenting the process, course and results of the programme, including the final information derived from the results of monitoring and evaluation. The issue of monitoring and evaluation of health promotion programmes, their procedure and methods should be addressed by further studies and development as part of the agenda of fields dealing with prevention and health promotion.
Keywords: health promotion programmes - assessment
Received: February 2013; Accepted: May 15, 2013; Published: March 1, 2014 Show citation
References
- Fernald D, Harris A, Deaton EA, Weister V, Pray S, Baumann C, et al. A standardized reporting system for assessment of diverse public health programs. Prev Chronic Dis. 2012;9:E147.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Kusek JZ, Rist RC. Ten steps to a result-based monitoring and evaluation system. Washington, DC: World Bank; 2004.
- Framework for program evaluation in public health. MMWR Recomm Rep. 1999 Sep 17;48(RR-11):1-40.
- Ager A, Zimmerman C, Unlu K, Rinehart R, Nyberg B, Zeanah C, et al. What strategies are appropriate for monitoring children outside of family care and evaluating the impact of the programs intended to serve them? Child Abuse Negl. 2012 Oct;36(10):732-42.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Rychetnik L, Frommer M, Hawe P, Shiell A. Criteria for evaluating evidence on public health interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002 Feb;56(2):119-27.
Go to original source...
- Saunders RP, Evans AE, Kenison K, Workman L, Dowda M, Chu YH. Conceptualizing, implementing, and monitoring a structural health promotion intervention in an organizational setting. Health Promot Pract. 2013 May;14(3):343-53.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- World Health Organization. Report of the meeting on community initiatives to improve nutrition and physical activity; 2008 Feb 21-22; Berlin, Germany [Internet]. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2010 [cited 2014 Jan 14]. Available from: http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/87422/E93702.pdf.
- Gopichandran V, Indira Krishna AK. Monitoring 'monitoring' and evaluating 'evaluation': an ethical framework for monitoring and evaluation in public health. J Med Ethics. 2013 Jan;39(1):31-5.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Wilensky GR. Cost-effectiveness information: yes, it's important, but keep it separate, please! Ann Intern Med. 2008 Jun 17;148(12):967-8.
Go to original source...
- Glasgow RE, Klesges LM, Dzewaltowski DA, Estabrooks PA, Vogt TM. Evaluating the impact of health promotion programs: using the RE-AIM framework to form summary measures for decision making involving complex issues. Health Educ Res. 2006 Oct;21(5):688-94.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Dooris M. Healthy settings: challenges to generating evidence of effectiveness. Health Promot Int. 2006 Mar;21(1):55-65.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Reedy AM, Luna RG, Olivas GS, Sujeer A. Local public health performance measurement: implementation strategies and lessons learned from aligning program evaluation indicators with the 10 essential public health services. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2005 Jul-Aug;11(4):317-25.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...