Hygiena 2016, 61(1):33-35 | DOI: 10.21101/hygiena.a1439

Noise Annoyance: a Health Problem or Acoustic Comfort?

Tomáš Hellmuth1, Dana Potužníková1,2, Pavel Junek1, Zdeněk Fiala2
1 Zdravotní ústav se sídlem v Ostravě, Národní referenční laboratoř pro komunální hluk, Ústí nad Orlicí
2 Univerzita Karlova v Praze, Lékařská fakulta Hradec Králové, Ústav hygieny a preventivního lékařství, Hradec Králové

In environmental noise management and regulation two categories of noise effects on humans should be taken into account: first by there are direct health effect and second by there is general noise annoyance belonging to the area of the quality of life. Noise, from the point of view of in both categories, should be regulated in the environment - the question is, however, the best proper authority and proper legislative tools for this regulation. Existing noise legislation within the agenda of the Ministry of Health concerns public health safety only and not the general reduction of all noise in the whole living environment. Solving the problem of general annoyance by noise is the a matter for the local authorities and the police. Lack of understanding of the difference of the two approaches often leads to unnecessary confusion in the lay public and the media, as well as in a number of cases among professionals.

Keywords: noise health effects, acoustic comfort, noise regulations

Received: July 2015; Accepted: December 8, 2015; Published: March 1, 2016  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Hellmuth T, Potužníková D, Junek P, Fiala Z. Noise Annoyance: a Health Problem or Acoustic Comfort? Hygiena. 2016;61(1):33-35. doi: 10.21101/hygiena.a1439.
Download citation

References

  1. European Environmental Agency. Good practice guide on noise exposure and potential health effects. EEA Technical report, no. 11/2010. Copenhagen: EEA; 2010.
  2. World Health Organization. Burden of disease from environmental noise: quantification of healthy life years lost in Europe [Internet]. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2011 [cited 2015 Dec 8]. Available from: http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/136466/e94888.pdf.
  3. Zákon č. 258/2000 Sb., o ochraně veřejného zdraví a o změně některých souvisejících zákonů, ve znění pozdějších předpisů. Sbírka zákonů ČR. 2000;částka 74:3622-64.
  4. Nařízení vlády č. 272/2011 Sb., o ochraně zdraví před nepříznivými účinky hluku a vibrací. Sbírka zákonů ČR. 2011;částka 97:3338-51.
  5. Noise from pubs and clubs. Final report [Internet]. Salford: University of Salford; 2005 [cited 2015 Dec 8]. Available from: http://randd.defra.gov.uk/Document.aspx?Document=NO01051_3182_FRP.pdf.
  6. Havránek J. a kol. Hluk a zdraví. Praha: Avicenum; 1990.
  7. Kroesen M, Molin EJ, van Wee B. Testing a theory of aircraft noise annoyance: a structural equation analysis. J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Jun;123(6):4250-60. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Syka J, Voldřich L, Vrabec F. Fyziologie a patofyziologie zraku a sluchu. Praha: Avicenum; 1981.
  9. Lekaviciute J, Kephalopoulos S, Stansfeld S, Clark C, editors. Final report ENNAH - European Network on Noise and Health. JRC scientific and policy reports. EU project no. 226442, FP-7-ENV-2008-1. European Union; 2013.
  10. ISO/FDIS 1996-1. Acoustics - Description, measurement and assessment of environmental noise - Part 1: Basic quantities and assessment procedures. Geneva: ISO; 2015.
  11. University of the West of England, Science Communication Unit. Public risk perception and environmental policy. Science for environment policy. Future brief, no. 8 [Internet]. European Union; 2014 [cited 2015 Dec 8]. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/integration/research/newsalert/pdf/public_risk_perception_environmental_policy_FB8_en.pdf.