Hygiena 2026, 71(1):9-13 | DOI: 10.21101/hygiena.a1911
Sedentary behavior levels of regional public health authority employees with different job responsibilities: a pilot study
- 1 Krajská hygienická stanice Libereckého kraje se sídlem v Liberci, Liberec, Česká republika
- 2 Technická univerzita v Liberci, Fakulta zdravotnických studií, Liberec, Česká republika
- 3 Technická univerzita v Liberci, Fakulta přírodovědně-humanitní a pedagogická, Liberec, Česká republika
- 4 Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci, Fakulta tělesné kultury, Olomouc, Česká republika
Objective: This pilot study aimed to assess sedentary behavior among employees of a regional public health authority with different types of work.
Methods: Research sample included 12 employees divided into three groups according to job type (A - office-based sedentary work, B - field workers, and C - technical staff). Participants underwent device-based monitoring using accelerometers. The pilot study included a questionnaire that assessed both sedentary behaviour as subjectively reported by the employee and their health status.
Results: The highest amount of sedentary time during working hours was observed in group A (506.8 ± 88.7 min), and the lowest in group B (425.5 ± 50.0 min). Sitting was the dominant posture in all groups compared to other postures (e.g., standing and walking). Most sedentary time occurred in uninterrupted bouts longer than 30 minutes.
Conclusion: The pilot study confirmed the predominance of sedentary behavior across all the employee types. The data obtained provide a basis for planning large‑scale research and support the integration of excessive sitting prevention into workplace policies and health promotion programs both within and beyond the organization.
Keywords: work load, prolonged sitting, questionnaire, accelerometer
Received: February 2026; Accepted: April 2026; Published: April 2026 Show citation
| ACS | AIP | APA | ASA | Harvard | Chicago | Chicago Notes | IEEE | ISO690 | MLA | NLM | Turabian | Vancouver |
References
- Tremblay MS, Aubert S, Barnes JD, Saunders TJ, Carson V, Latimer-Cheung AE, et al; SBRN Terminology Consensus Project Participants. Sedentary Behavior Research Network (SBRN) - Terminology Consensus Project process and outcome. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 Jun 10;14(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0525-8.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed... - de Rezende LF, Rodrigues Lopes M, Rey-López JP, Matsudo VK, Luiz Odo C. Sedentary behavior and health outcomes: an overview of systematic reviews. PLoS One. 2014 Aug 21;9(8):e105620. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105620.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed... - Wilmot EG, Edwardson CL, Achana FA, Davies MJ, Gorely T, Gray LJ, et al. Sedentary time in adults and the association with diabetes, cardiovascular disease and death: systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetologia. 2012 Nov;55(11):2895-905.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed... - World Health Organization. WHO guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Geneva: WHO; 2020.
- Franssen WMA, Jermei J, Savelberg HHCM, Eijnde BO. The potential harms of sedentary behaviour on cardiometabolic health are mitigated in highly active adults: a compositional data analysis. J Act Sedentary Sleep Behav. 2023 Mar 2;2(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s44167-023-00015-7.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed... - Bailey DP. Sedentary behaviour in the workplace: prevalence, health implications and interventions. Br Med Bull. 2021 Mar 25;137(1):42-50.
Go to original source... - Doporučení Rady ze dne 26. listopadu 2013 o podpoře zdraví upevňující tělesné aktivity ve všech odvětvích. Úřední věstník EU. 2013;56(C354):1-5.
- Peereboom P, de Langen N, Bortkiewicz A. Prolonged static sitting at work: Health effects and good practice advice. Bilbao: European Agency for Safety and Health at Work; 2021.
- Dunstan DW, Dogra S, Carter SE, Owen N. Sit less and move more for cardiovascular health: emerging insights and opportunities. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2021 Sep;18(9):637-48.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...


