Hygiena 2012, 57(4):135-143
Comparison of Physical Fitness Examinations Measured on Bicycle Ergometer and Treadmill for the Purpose of Primary Preventive Examination
- 1 Ústav preventivního lékařství, Lékařská fakulta, Masarykova univerzita, Brno
- 2 Mezinárodní centrum klinického výzkumu, Cardio 6, Fakultní nemocnice u sv. Anny v Brně, Brno
The aim of this pilot study was to compare the results of two commonly used indirect methods of assessing maximum oxygen uptake (VO2max estimation) and to assess the applicability of these two methods for physical fitness assessment of an individual as part of primary preventive examination. For this comparison we selected the Cooper run/walk test (CT 12) on a treadmill and an incremental maximum test on a bicycle ergometer (BE). Our results showed significantly lower VO2max estimations gained from CT 12 on a treadmill in comparison to incremental maximum testing on a BE in the population groups examined. In total the results were lower by about 8.6% on average (p<0.001). The differences varied in the groups according to how trained the subjects were and according to the prevailing type of their physical activity. The highest differences between the two tests appeared in the group of cyclists (-12.0%), medical students (-10.9%) and in the group of subjects without a preferred type of physical activity. In these groups the differences were also statistically significant (p<0.01). They were less substantial in the group of runners (-4.6%, statistically insignificant), and in the group of triathletes there were practically no differences. This suggests that a CT 12 on a treadmill is much more susceptible to influences such as training experience, prevailing type of physical activity and motivation compared with an incremental maximum test on a BE. Evaluation of results leads us to consider incremental maximal testing on a BE a more suitable tool for assessing physical fitness in the averagely trained and slightly above-averagely trained population.
Keywords: physical fitness, endurance tests, Cooper walk/run test, bicycle ergometry
Received: March 2012; Accepted: July 3, 2012; Published: December 1, 2012 Show citation
References
- Bunc V, Heller J. Exercise intensity conversion from a bicycle ergometer to a treadmill. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 1991 Sep;31(3):490-3.
Go to PubMed...
- BuncV,HellerJ.Conversionof theintensityof loadingfromthe bicycle ergometer to a treadmill and to field training in women. Cas Lek Cesk. 1991 Dec 13;130(24-25):696-8. (In Czech.)
Go to PubMed...
- Donoso H, Osorio J. Measurement of maximal oxygen uptake in a Chilean population sample. Rev Med Chil. 1997 Sep;125(9):1002-10. (In Spanish.)
Go to PubMed...
- Placheta Z, Siegelová J, Štejfa M a kol. Zátěžová diagnostika v ambulantní a klinické praxi. Praha: Grada; 1999.
- Fox SM 3rd, Naughton JP, Haskell WL. Physical activity and the prevention of coronary heart disease. Ann Clin Res. 1971 Dec;3(6):404-32.
- Quinn E. Fitness test - 12 minute run fitness test for endurance [Internet]. New York: About.com; c2012 [cited 2012 Jun 30]. Available from: http://sportsmedicine.about.com/od/fitnessevalandassessment/a/12MinRun.htm.
- Weisgerber M, Danduran M, Meurer J, Hartmann K, Berger S, Flores G. Evaluation of Cooper 12-minute walk/run test as a marker of cardiorespiratory fitness in young urban children with persistent asthma. Clin J Sport Med. 2009 Jul;19(4):300-5.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Cooper KH. A means of assessing maximal oxygen intake. Correlation between field and treadmill testing. JAMA. 1968 Jan 15;203(3):201-4.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- George JD, Vehrs PR, Babcock GJ, Etchie MP, Chinevere TD, Fellingham GW. A Modified submaximal cycle ergometer test designed to predict treadmill VO2max. Meas Phys Educ Exerc Sci. 2000;4(4):229-43.
Go to original source...
- Welsman JR, Armstrong N. Interpreting exercise performance data in relation to body size. In: Armstrong N, van Mechelen W, editors. Paediatric exercise science and medicine. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000. p. 3-9.
- Penry JT, Wilcox AR, Yun J. Validity and reliability analysis of Cooper's 12-minute run and the multistage shuttle run in healthy adults. J Strength Cond Res. 2011 Mar;25(3):597-605.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Grant S, Corbett K, Amjad AM, Wilson J, Aitchison T. A comparison of methods of predicting maximum oxygen uptake. Br J Sports Med. 1995 Sep;29(3):147-52.
Go to original source...
- Marinov B, Kostianev S, Turnovska T. Modified treadmill protocol for evaluation of physical fitness in pediatric age group - comparison with Bruce and Balke protocols. Acta Physiol Pharmacol Bulg. 2003;27(2-3):47-51.
Go to PubMed...
- Pinkstaff S, Peberdy MA, Kontos MC, Finucane S, Arena R. Quantifying exertion level during exercise stress testing using percentage of age-predicted maximal heart rate, rate pressure product, and perceived exertion. Mayo Clin Proc. 2010 Dec;85(12):1095-100.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Lear SA, Brozic A, Myers JN, Ignaszewski A. Exercise stress testing. An overview of current guidelines. Sports Med. 1999 May;27(5):285-312.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Sánchez J, Donoso H. Maximal oxygen uptake in Chilean workers of normal nutritional status. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1988;57(1):26-32.
Go to original source...
- McArdle WD, Katch FI, Pechar GS. Comparison of continuous and discontinuous treadmill and bicycle tests for max Vo2. Med Sci Sports. 1973 Fall;5(3):156-60.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Miles DS, Critz JB, Knowlton RG. Cardiovascular, metabolic, and ventilatory responses of women to equivalent cycle ergometer and treadmill exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1980 Spring;12(1):14-9.
Go to original source...
- Loftin M, Sothern M, Warren B, Udall J. Comparison of VO2 peak during treadmill and cycle ergometry in severely overweight youth. J Sports Sci Med. 2004;3(4):254-60.
- Dencker M, Thorsson O, Karlsson MK, Lindén C, Wollmer P, Andersen LB. Maximal oxygen uptake versus maximal power output in children. J Sports Sci. 2008 Nov;26(13):1397-402.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...